<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SpamSieve Required</title>
	<atom:link href="http://roobasoft.com/blog/2006/08/23/spamsieve-required/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://roobasoft.com/blog/2006/08/23/spamsieve-required/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 01:36:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Batton</title>
		<link>http://roobasoft.com/blog/2006/08/23/spamsieve-required/comment-page-1/#comment-748</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Batton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roobasoft.com/blog/2006/08/23/spamsieve-required/#comment-748</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I couldn&#039;t agree more. Although I get about 100 spams/day, none of it ever bothers me thanks to SpamSieve. It does an amazing job of learning what I consider spam. That&#039;s something the server-based spam filters (and even spam filters built into mail apps) can&#039;t do.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more. Although I get about 100 spams/day, none of it ever bothers me thanks to SpamSieve. It does an amazing job of learning what I consider spam. That&#8217;s something the server-based spam filters (and even spam filters built into mail apps) can&#8217;t do.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

